NVIDIA official GeForce RTX 3060 Ti performance leaked

Published: Nov 16th 2020, 18:14 GMT   Comments

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti officially faster than RTX 2080 SUPER

NVIDIA expects GeForce RTX 3060 Ti to be 1.4x faster than RTX 2060 SUPER, according to the official slide that was released to the press today. The slide did not have any performance figures and the press event was lacking in any detail, but we managed to measure the bars to give you a rough estimate of the card performance.

The graphics cards were tested with stock clocks at 2560×1440 resolution using Intel Core i9-10900K CPU.

NVIDIA is targetting RTX 2080 SUPER with the new model being faster by a few percent, according to the data we collected. There are a few differences between both SKUs and few similarities. The RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 2080 SUPER both feature 8GB GDDR6 memory, but the latter was the only Turing model to have 15.5 Gbps modules. Meanwhile, the RTX 3060 Ti will stick to 14 Gbps. The graphics card will also be a lot cheaper, expected to be under 400 USD, while the fastest SUPER GeForce from 2019 retailed at 699 USD.

The benchmark results were divided into three groups: rasterizing, ray tracing, and rendering. The RTX 3060 Ti wins with RTX 2080 SUPER in all scenarios, even in ray tracing, despite featuring a fewer number of RT cores than RTX 2080 SUPER (38 vs 48).

Unfortunately, NVIDIA has not yet confirmed the specifications of the graphics card. The company did however confirm that the RTX 3060 Ti will launch on December 2nd.

Official NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti performance, Source: VideoCardz

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30 Series
VideoCardz.comRTX 3090RTX 3080RTX 3070RTX 3060 TiRTX 2080 SUPER
Picture
Reference BoardPG132 SKU 30PG132 SKU 10PG142 SKU 10PG190 SKU 10PG180 SKU 40
GPU8nm GA102-3008nm GA102-2008nm GA104-3008nm GA104-20012nm TU104-450
Die Size
 
628 mm2
 
628 mm2
 
392 mm2
 
392 mm2
 
545 mm2
Transistors
 
28.3 B
 
28.3 B
 
17.4 B
 
17.4 B
 
13.6 B
CUDA Cores
 
10496
 
8704
 
5888
 
4864
 
3072
Tensor Cores
 
328
 
272
 
184
 
152
 
384
RT Cores
 
82
 
68
 
46
 
38
 
48
Base Clock
 
1395 MHz
 
1440 MHz
 
1500 MHz
 
1410 MHz
 
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
 
1695 MHz
 
1710 MHz
 
1725 MHz
 
1665 MHz
 
1815 MHz
Shader Perf.
 
35.6 TFLOPS
 
29.8 TFLOPS
 
20.3 TFLOPS
 
16.2 TFLOPS
 
11.2 TFLOPS
Memory
 
24 GB G6X
 
10 GB G6X
 
8 GB G6
 
8 GB G6
 
8 GB G6
Memory Clock
 
19.5 Gbps
 
19 Gbps
 
14 Gbps
 
14 Gbps
 
15.5 Gbps
Memory Bus
 
384-bit
 
320-bit
 
256-bit
 
256-bit
 
256-bit
Max Bandwidth
 
936 GB/s
 
760 GB/s
 
448 GB/s
 
448 GB/s
 
497 GB/s
Thermal Design
 
350W
 
320W
 
220W
 
~180-200W
 
250W
MSRP
 
$1,499
 
$699
 
$499
 
< $399
 
< $699
Release DateSep 24th, 2020Sep 17th, 2020Oct 29th, 2020Dec 2nd, 2020Jul 23th, 2019

Additionally, we have the first RTX 3060 Ti arriving at the stores. The ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti TUF is confirmed to be triple-fan design, the same cooler as RTX 3070 from the looks of it.

ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti TUF, Source: PCMasterRace




Comment Policy
  1. Comments must be written in English and should not exceed 1000 characters.
  2. Comments deemed to be spam or solely promotional in nature will be deleted. Including a link to relevant content is permitted, but comments should be relevant to the post topic. Discussions about politics are not allowed on this website.
  3. Comments and usernames containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive will be deleted.
  4. Comments complaining about the post subject or its source will be removed.
  5. A failure to comply with these rules will result in a warning and, in extreme cases, a ban. In addition, please note that comments that attack or harass an individual directly will result in a ban without warning.
  6. VideoCardz has never been sponsored by AMD, Intel, or NVIDIA. Users claiming otherwise will be banned.
  7. VideoCardz Moderating Team reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to the site without notice.
  8. If you have any questions about the commenting policy, please let us know through the Contact Page.
Hide Comment Policy
Comments